Quinn-tessentials

Quinn IP Law takes pride in its reputation as a forward-thinking law firm focused on impeccable quality over billable hours. We constantly strive to improve our practice and make positive and insightful contributions to our field. From thought leadership to community service, you can learn about our team’s most recent work and achievements here.

Quinn IP Law Attorney Staci DeRegnaucourt Recognized with 2019 WTR 1000 Gold Ranking by World Trademark Review

NORTHVILLE – Quinn IP Law is excited to announce that our attorney Staci DeRegnaucourt received a Gold Ranking by World Trademark Review in their annual World’s Leading Trademark Professionals WTR-1000 research directory.   Staci is one of only three recipients of WTR 1000’s gold ranking in the State of Michigan.   Individual practitioners qualify for inclusion in the WTR 1000 solely on receiving sufficient positive feedback from market sources. The WTR 1000 results are presented in bands–gold, silver and bronze–to reflect the depth of expertise, market presence and level of work on which individual practitioners are typically instructed “Individuals in the…

Read More

Quinn IP Law’s 3rd Year to Volunteer and Support Detroit-Based Non-Profit: Life Remodeled

Quinn IP Law is a proud supporter of community-based initiatives that improve the lives of our fellow citizens in Michigan and beyond. On Oct. 3, The Quinn team volunteered with Life Remodeled, a Detroit-based nonprofit committed to the revitalization of the city’s urban neighborhoods. Life Remodeled pairs neighborhood residents with businesses and individual volunteers to work within a selected neighborhood over a period of six days, cleaning up trash and landscaping, repairing homes, and renovating community structures. This year, in response to the vision and requests from the community, our team, part of over 10,000 volunteers, beautified more than 300 city blocks, …

Read More

Objective Indicia In Obviousness: Part of Entirety of Evidence or Rebuttal for Prima Facie Obviousness?

Objective Indicia in Obviousness: Part of Entirety Evidence or Rubuttal for Prima Facie Obviousness? Determining Obviousness for an Invention As presented in 35 U.S.C. §103, a patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained “if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious” to one of ordinary skill in the art. The Supreme Court, in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), first laid out the factors by which legal determinations of obviousness may be made: the scope and content of the prior art; the differences between the prior…

Read More