John J. Ignatowski

jignatowski@QuinnIPLaw.com

(248) 380 – 9300, ext: 141

When protecting complex technology, clients benefit from a patent attorney who can understand the engineering behind an invention and communicate it clearly within the patent process. That ability is central to John Ignatowski’s approach. He considers himself a translator—bilingual in engineering and patent law—able to move comfortably between conversations with engineers and the precise language required for patent applications and examination.

John is a 2nd generation patent attorney. Over the last 25 years he has obtained more than 1,000 U.S. patents including working with world-wide clients in a variety of countries such as Canada, China, India, Italy, Japan, Russia, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.

Clients rely on John to accurately understand what they have created, identify the technical details that are important to protecting it, and translate those details into clear, comprehensive patent applications. Because he has an electrical engineering background as well as extensive experience in patent law, he can engage directly with engineers and technical teams without requiring them to first translate their work into legal terms. At the same time, he knows how to communicate complex technology so that it can be understood by patent examiners and others who may not have the same technical expertise.

That combination of technical understanding and legal experience is particularly valuable when inventions involve sophisticated electrical and computer technologies. John’s experience includes semiconductor technology, integrated circuits, software, communications systems, control systems, consumer electronics, aeronautics, automotive, and other advanced technologies. He can engage with the underlying technology at a level that allows him to accurately capture an inventor’s work while recognizing the technical distinctions that can matter during patent examination.

Clients also value John’s judgment and the trust that develops through long-term relationships. As he becomes familiar with a client’s technology, business, and patent objectives, clients increasingly rely on his recommendations and ability to move matters forward. Established clients often give John significant latitude to manage prosecution and make recommendations without requiring extensive explanation at every step. For newer clients, he takes the time to explain the reasoning behind his recommendations and build the same level of confidence over time.

John approaches every matter with the expectation that the work should meet the highest standards of quality, regardless of the amount of time required. That commitment is particularly important in a fixed-fee environment, where doing the job well can sometimes require more effort than the fee alone would suggest. His focus is on delivering work clients can rely on—not simply completing the task at hand.

John’s approach also reflects a simple standard for effective communication: complex technology should be understandable without losing its technical precision. He continually asks whether an invention has been explained clearly enough for someone without an engineering background to understand it. That discipline helps produce patent applications that accurately convey the technology while remaining accessible to the broader audience involved in the patent process.

John has practiced patent law for decades, representing clients ranging from individual inventors to companies developing highly sophisticated technologies. Before becoming a patent attorney, he earned his B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan and passed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office registration examination on his first attempt. He later earned his J.D. from Wayne State University Law School, combining his technical background with the legal training necessary to help innovators protect their intellectual property.

At Quinn IP Law, John brings that combination of engineering knowledge, patent experience, practical judgment, and commitment to quality to every client relationship.

Practice Areas

  • Copyrights
  • IP Litigation
  • Licensing & Monetization
  • Patents
  • Portfolio Management
  • Post Grant Proceedings

Industries

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Automotive
  • Biotechnology & Biomedical Engineering
  • Consumer Electronics
  • Electrical & Computer Science-Engineering
  • Image Processing & Optics
  • Manufacturing
  • Mechanical & Electromechanical Engineering
  • Semiconductor Processing & Devices
  • Software & Information Technology
  • Telecommunications & Wireless Technology

Education

  • J.D., Wayne State University Law School
  • M.S.E.E., University of Michigan, Electrical Engineering
  • B.S.E.E., University of Michigan, Electrical Engineering

Admissions

  • Michigan U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • ...
  • State Bar of Michigan
  • Michigan Intellectual Property Law Association